Structured Scaling of AI Discovery Across Diverse Scientific Domains
arxiv:2604.19341
Harness · 2026-04-21
Complete cleaned Markdown · Source Markdown including bibliography
Read in parts
Contents
- Introduction
- Overview of SimpleTES
- SimpleTES discovers effective algorithms to reduce quantum compilation overhead
- SimpleTES improves optimizers for fuel-efficient deep-space trajectories
- SimpleTES discovers better scientific algorithms
- SimpleTES discovers a geometry-aware lasso solver that surpasses glmnet .
- SimpleTES discovers new state-of-the-art predictor for Zebrafish whole-brain neural-activity.
- SimpleTES improves AI foundations
- GPU kernel optimization.
- Scaling-law discovery.
- Post-training the LLM for SimpleTES leads to new mathematical discoveries
- Discussion
- Code availability
- Supplementary Information
- Contents
- A Authors
- B Related Work
- B.1 Existing Evaluation-Driven Discovery Methods
- AlphaEvolve [ 100 ] .
- OpenEvolve [ 6 ] .
- ShinkaEvolve [ 73 ] .
- ThetaEvolve [ 155 ] .
- TTT-Discover [ 165 ] .
- AdaEvolve [ 23 ] .
- EvoX [ 82 ] .
- GEPA [ 2 ] .
- Summary.
- B.2 Self-evolving AI
- Reward-based Self-Evolution.
- Imitation & Demonstration Learning.
- Population-based & Evolutionary Methods.
- B.3 LLM for Scientific Discovery
- LLM based scientific discovery systems.
- Scientific benchmarks for LLMs.
- Important results proposed by LLM systems.
- B.4 Test-Time Scaling
- Parallel Scaling.
- Sequential Scaling.
- Hybrid Scaling.
- Internal Scaling.
- C Theoretical Modeling of SimpleTES
- Definition .2 (Multidimensional Problem Refinement Trajectory) .
- Number of global independent trials C C .
- Theorem .3 .
- Proof.
- Remark.
- Local sample size K K .
- D Method Analysis
- D.1 Experiments on the Scaling Behavior of SimpleTES
- Scalability of global width ( C C ) and refinement depth ( L L ).
- Scalability of local sample size ( K K ) and refinement depth ( L L ).
- Scalability of the total evaluation budget ( N N ).
- D.2 Experimental Details on Post-Training
- Training improves the trajectory scores on the training tasks.
- Training enables generalization to the held-out tasks.
- Training unlocks stronger solutions that vanilla models fail to uncover.
- D.3 From Golden Metrics to Surrogate: Hacking Analysis
- Hacking in math construction tasks.
- Hacking in kernel optimization tasks.
- Discussion.
- E Variants of Proposal Constructor Φ \Phi
- Balance policy.
- LLM-Elite policy.
- F Ablation Studies
- F.1 Ablations on Different Designs of Φ \Phi
- F.2 Ablation on Reflection and Failure Patterns
- F.3 Efficiency Analysis: Trajectory-level Pruning
- G Wall-clock Time Efficiency
- H Quantum Compilation Tasks
- H.1 Problem definitions
- Superconducting qubit routing.
- Zoned neutral-atom compilation.
- H.2 Experimental scaffolds and evaluation setup
- Superconducting routing setup.
- Zoned neutral-atom setup.
- H.3 Discovered programs
- Discovered superconducting algorithm.
- Discovered zoned neutral-atom algorithm.
- H.4 Discovered superconducting routing policy using Gemini
- I Astrodynamics trajectory design
- I.1 Task formulation and program interface
- I.2 Independent trajectory evaluator
- I.3 Benchmark instances
- I.4 Construction of historical-sequence references
- I.5 How evolution changes mission-design search
- J GPU Kernel Optimization
- Task definitions and benchmark settings.
- TriMul evaluation alignment.
- Cross-device performance generalization.
- K Scaling Law Discovery
- Overview.
- Experimental setting.
- Results analysis.
- Case study.
- L Whole-brain neural-activity forecast on ZAPBench
- Problem definition and benchmark design.
- Forecasting task and data splits.
- Evaluation and search protocol.
- M Single-Cell RNA-Seq Denoising
- N Lasso Regularization Path
- Overview.
- Experimental setting.
- Results analysis.
- Case study.
- O Mathematical Scientific Discovery Tasks
- O.1 Extremal analysis
- Erdős minimum-overlap problem.
- Autocorrelation Inequalities.
- O.2 Combinatorial construction
- Sum–Difference Problem.
- Circle Packing in a Unit Square.
- Hadamard maximum-determinant problem of order 29 29 .
- Instructions for reporting errors