Recursive Self-Improvement via On-Policy Distillation for Reasoning
arxiv:2609.30652
Post-training · 2026-09-25
Complete cleaned Markdown · Source Markdown including bibliography
Read in parts
Contents
- Recursive Self-Improvement via On-Policy Distillation for Reasoning
- Abstract
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Related Work
- 2.1 Reflection and Verification in Reasoning Post-Training
- 2.2 On-Policy and Privileged Self-Distillation
- 2.3 Self-Refinement and Efficient Reasoning
- 3 Method
- 3.1 Dynamic Co-Evolution
- 3.2 Self-Refined Concise Learning
- 3.3 Joint Optimization
- 4 Experimental Setup
- 4.1 Models, Data, and Metrics
- 4.2 Baselines and Controls
- 4.3 Training Protocol
- 5 Results
- 5.1 Main Experimental Results
- 5.2 Does Recursive Improvement Transfer Beyond Qwen3?
- 5.3 What Happens During Recursive Self-Improvement?
- 5.4 How Do Different Loss Weights Affect Performance?
- 5.5 How Does the Guidance Objective Influence Performance?
- 5.6 Does the Privileged Teacher Need to Co-Evolve?
- 5.7 Which Representation of the Verified Solution Works Better?
- 5.8 How Does the Method Perform under Tight Reasoning Budgets?
- 5.9 How Sensitive Is Performance to Decoding Hyperparameters?
- 6 Conclusion
- Appendix A Does Recursive Improvement Scale to a Larger Model?
- Appendix B Gemma-4-12B-IT Training Details and Additional Results
- Appendix C Complete Qwen3-8B and Qwen3-4B Trajectories
- Appendix D Teacher-Update Schedules
- Appendix E Effect of Privileged-Context Placement
- Evolution of the privileged signal.
- Appendix F Qwen3-1.7B Training Stability
- Appendix G Fixed-Trace Probe Values
- Appendix H EOS-Penalty Ablation
- Objective.
- Results.
- Appendix I Cross-Scale Evaluation of OPSD-TTS
- Appendix J Reproducibility Details
- Appendix K Additional SRCL-Weight Sensitivity
- Appendix L Results on Additional Benchmarks
- Appendix M SRCL Rewrite Filtering and Acceptance
- Filtering pipeline.
- Endpoint verification.
- Appendix N Prompt Templates
- Instructions for reporting errors