Parametrically Retargetable Decision-Makers Tend To Seek Power — part 13/13
Cleaned-text code points [183867, 191049). Bibliography omitted here; source.md includes it.
Let D ∗ ≔ D ′ ∪ i = 1 n D i ∪ ( RSD nd ( s ) ∖ ( D ′ ∪ D ) ) D^{*}\coloneqq D^{\prime}\cup_{i=1}^{n}D_{i}\cup\left(\text{{RSD}}{\text{\textsubscript{nd}}}\left(s\right)\setminus\left(D^{\prime}\cup D\right)\right) . By an argument mirroring that in the proof of theorem 6.13 in Turner et al. [2021] and using the fact that ϕ i ′ ⋅ D j = D j \phi_{i}^{\prime}\cdot D_{j}=D_{j} for all i ≠ j i\neq j , ϕ i ′ ⋅ D ∗ = D ∗ \phi_{i}^{\prime}\cdot D^{*}=D^{*} . Consider Z ≔ ( RSD nd ( s ) ∖ ( D ′ ∪ D ) ) ∪ D ′ ∪ D Z\coloneqq\left(\text{{RSD}}{\text{\textsubscript{nd}}}\left(s\right)\setminus(D^{\prime}\cup D)\right)\cup D^{\prime}\cup D . First, Z ⊆ RSD ( s ) Z\subseteq\text{{RSD}}\left(s\right) by definition. Second, RSD nd ( s ) = RSD nd ( s ) ∖ ( D ′ ∪ D ) ∪ ( RSD nd ( s ) ∩ D ′ ) ∪ ( RSD nd ( s ) ∩ D ) ⊆ Z \text{{RSD}}{\text{\textsubscript{nd}}}\left(s\right)=\text{{RSD}}{\text{\textsubscript{nd}}}\left(s\right)\setminus(D^{\prime}\cup D)\cup\left(\text{{RSD}}{\text{\textsubscript{nd}}}\left(s\right)\cap D^{\prime}\right)\cup\left(\text{{RSD}}{\text{\textsubscript{nd}}}\left(s\right)\cap D\right)\subseteq Z . Note that D ∗ = Z ∖ ( D ∖ ∪ i = 1 n D i ) D^{*}=Z\setminus(D\setminus\cup_{i=1}^{n}D_{i}) . ℙ 𝒟 any ( D ′ , average ) \displaystyle\Prb\nolimits_{\mathcal{D}_{\text{any}}}\left(D^{\prime},\text{average}\right) = p 𝒟 any ( D ′ ≥ RSD ( s ) ) \displaystyle=p_{\mathcal{D}_{\text{any}}}\left(D^{\prime}\geq\text{{RSD}}\left(s\right)\right) (152) ≤ most : 𝔇 any n p 𝒟 any ( D ≥ RSD ( s ) ) \displaystyle\leq_{\text{{most}}\text{: }\mathfrak{D}_{\text{any}}}^{n}p_{\mathcal{D}_{\text{any}}}\left(D\geq\text{{RSD}}\left(s\right)\right) (153) = ℙ 𝒟 any ( D , average ) . \displaystyle=\Prb\nolimits_{\mathcal{D}_{\text{any}}}\left(D,\text{average}\right). (154) Since ϕ i ′ ⋅ D ′ ⊆ D \phi_{i}^{\prime}\cdot D^{\prime}\subseteq D and ND ( D ′ ) ⊆ D ′ \text{{ND}}\left(D^{\prime}\right)\subseteq D^{\prime} , ϕ i ′ ⋅ ND ( D ′ ) ⊆ D \phi_{i}^{\prime}\cdot\text{{ND}}\left(D^{\prime}\right)\subseteq D and so D D contains n n copies of ND ( D ′ ) \text{{ND}}\left(D^{\prime}\right) via involutions ϕ i ′ \phi_{i}^{\prime} . Then eq. 153 holds by applying Lemma D.5 with A ≔ D ′ A\coloneqq D^{\prime} , B i ≔ D i B_{i}\coloneqq D_{i} for all i = 1 , … , n i=1,\ldots,n , B ≔ D , C ≔ RSD ( s ) B\coloneqq D,C\coloneqq\text{{RSD}}\left(s\right) , Z Z as defined above, and involutions ϕ i ′ \phi_{i}^{\prime} which satisfy ϕ i ′ ⋅ ( Z ∖ ( B ∖ ∪ i = 1 n B i ) ) = ϕ i ′ ⋅ D ∗ = D ∗ = Z ∖ ( B ∖ ∪ i = 1 n B i ) \phi_{i}^{\prime}\cdot\left(Z\setminus(B\setminus\cup_{i=1}^{n}B_{i})\right)=\phi_{i}^{\prime}\cdot D^{*}=D^{*}=Z\setminus(B\setminus\cup_{i=1}^{n}B_{i}) . ∎
###### Corollary D.12 (Quantitatively, average-optimal policies tend not to end up in any given 1-cycle) .
Let D ′ ≔ { 𝐞 s 1 ′ , … , 𝐞 s k ′ } , D r ≔ { 𝐞 s 1 , … , 𝐞 s n ⋅ k } ⊆ RSD ( s ) D^{\prime}\coloneqq\left\{\mathbf{e}_{s_{1}^{\prime}},\ldots,\mathbf{e}_{s_{k}^{\prime}}\right\},D_{r}\coloneqq\left\{\mathbf{e}_{s_{1}},\ldots,\mathbf{e}_{s_{n\cdot k}}\right\}\subseteq\text{{RSD}}\left(s\right) be disjoint, for n ≥ 1 , k ≥ 1 n\geq 1,k\geq 1 . Then ℙ 𝒟 any ( D ′ , average ) ≤ most : 𝔇 any n ℙ 𝒟 any ( RSD ( s ) ∖ D ′ , average ) \Prb\nolimits_{\mathcal{D}_{\text{any}}}\left(D^{\prime},\text{average}\right)\leq_{\text{{most}}\text{: }\mathfrak{D}_{\text{any}}}^{n}\Prb\nolimits_{\mathcal{D}_{\text{any}}}\left(\text{{RSD}}\left(s\right)\setminus D^{\prime},\text{average}\right) .
###### Proof.
For each i ∈ { 1 , … , n } i\in\left\{1,\ldots,n\right\} , let ϕ i \displaystyle\phi_{i} ≔ ( s 1 ′ s ( i − 1 ) ⋅ k + 1 ) ⋯ ( s k ′ s ( i − 1 ) ⋅ k + k ) , \displaystyle\coloneqq(s_{1}^{\prime}\,\,\,s_{(i-1)\cdot k+1})\cdots(s_{k}^{\prime}\,\,\,s_{(i-1)\cdot k+k}), D i \displaystyle D_{i} ≔ { 𝐞 s ( i − 1 ) ⋅ k + 1 , … , 𝐞 s ( i − 1 ) ⋅ k + k } , \displaystyle\coloneqq\left\{\mathbf{e}_{s_{(i-1)\cdot k+1}},\ldots,\mathbf{e}_{s_{(i-1)\cdot k+k}}\right\}, D \displaystyle D ≔ RSD ( s ) ∖ D ′ . \displaystyle\coloneqq\text{{RSD}}\left(s\right)\setminus D^{\prime}. Each D i ⊆ D r ⊆ RSD ( s ) ∖ D ′ D_{i}\subseteq D_{r}\subseteq\text{{RSD}}\left(s\right)\setminus D^{\prime} by disjointness of D ′ D^{\prime} and D r D_{r} .
D D contains n n copies of D ′ D^{\prime} via involutions ϕ 1 , … , ϕ n \phi_{1},\ldots,\phi_{n} . D ′ ∪ D = RSD ( s ) D^{\prime}\cup D=\text{{RSD}}\left(s\right) and RSD nd ( s ) ∖ RSD ( s ) = ∅ \text{{RSD}}{\text{\textsubscript{nd}}}\left(s\right)\setminus\text{{RSD}}\left(s\right)=\emptyset trivially have pairwise orthogonal vector elements.
Apply Theorem D.11 to conclude that ℙ 𝒟 any ( D ′ , average ) ≤ most : 𝔇 any n ℙ 𝒟 any ( RSD ( s ) ∖ D ′ , average ) . \Prb\nolimits_{\mathcal{D}_{\text{any}}}\left(D^{\prime},\text{average}\right)\leq_{\text{{most}}\text{: }\mathfrak{D}_{\text{any}}}^{n}\Prb\nolimits_{\mathcal{D}_{\text{any}}}\left(\text{{RSD}}\left(s\right)\setminus D^{\prime},\text{average}\right). ∎
Let A ≔ { 𝐞 1 , 𝐞 2 } , B ⊆ ℝ 5 A\coloneqq\left\{\mathbf{e}_{1},\mathbf{e}_{2}\right\},B\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{5} , C ≔ A ∪ B C\coloneqq A\cup B . Conjecture D.13 conjectures that e . g ., p 𝒟 ′ ( B ≥ C ) ≥ most : 𝔇 any 3 2 p 𝒟 ′ ( A ≥ C ) . p_{\mathcal{D}^{\prime}}\left(B\geq C\right)\geq_{\text{{most}}\text{: }\mathfrak{D}_{\text{any}}}^{\frac{3}{2}}p_{\mathcal{D}^{\prime}}\left(A\geq C\right).
###### Conjecture D.13 (Fractional quantitative optimality probability superiority lemma) .
Let A A , B B , C ⊊ ℝ d C\subsetneq\mathbb{R}^{d} be finite. If A = ⋃ j = 1 m A j A=\bigcup_{j=1}^{m}A_{j} and ⋃ i = 1 n B i ⊆ B \bigcup_{i=1}^{n}B_{i}\subseteq B such that for each A j A_{j} , B B contains n n copies ( B 1 , … , B n B_{1},\ldots,B_{n} ) of A j A_{j} via involutions ϕ j i \phi_{ji} which also fix ϕ j i ⋅ A j ′ = A j ′ \phi_{ji}\cdot A_{j^{\prime}}=A_{j^{\prime}} for j ′ ≠ j j^{\prime}\neq j , then p 𝒟 any ( B ≥ C ) ≥ most : 𝔇 any n m p 𝒟 any ( A ≥ C ) . p_{\mathcal{D}_{\text{any}}}\left(B\geq C\right)\geq_{\text{{most}}\text{: }\mathfrak{D}_{\text{any}}}^{\frac{n}{m}}p_{\mathcal{D}_{\text{any}}}\left(A\geq C\right).
We suspect that any proof of the conjecture should generalize Lemma B.7 to the fractional set copy containment case.
## Instructions for reporting errors
We are continuing to improve HTML versions of papers, and your feedback helps enhance accessibility and mobile support. To report errors in the HTML that will help us improve conversion and rendering, choose any of the methods listed below:
Click the "Report Issue" ( ) button, located in the page header.
Tip: You can select the relevant text first, to include it in your report.
Our team has already identified the following issues . We appreciate your time reviewing and reporting rendering errors we may not have found yet. Your efforts will help us improve the HTML versions for all readers, because disability should not be a barrier to accessing research. Thank you for your continued support in championing open access for all.
Have a free development cycle? Help support accessibility at arXiv! Our collaborators at LaTeXML maintain a list of packages that need conversion , and welcome developer contributions .