Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization
arxiv:2210.10760
Data, training, optimization · 2022-10-19
Complete cleaned Markdown · Source Markdown including bibliography
Read in parts
Contents
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization
- Abstract
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Methodology
- 2.1 Synthetic Data Setup
- 2.2 Recalibration
- 3 Results
- 3.1 Fitting and validating functional forms
- 3.2 Scaling with RM Parameter Count
- 3.3 Scaling with RM Data Size
- 3.4 Scaling with Policy Size
- Larger policies see less benefit from optimization against an RM, but don’t overoptimize more.
- 3.5 RL vs BoN
- RL is far less KL-efficient than BoN.
- When looking at proxy vs gold RM scores, BoN and RL look more similar.
- 3.6 Effect of KL Penalty
- 4 Discussion
- 4.1 KL as a measure of amount of optimization
- 4.2 Relation to Goodhart Taxonomy
- 4.2.1 Regressional Goodhart
- 4.2.2 Extremal Goodhart
- 4.2.3 Causal Goodhart
- 4.2.4 Adversarial Goodhart
- 4.3 Implications for iterated RLHF
- 4.4 Policy size independence
- 4.5 Limitations and Future Work
- 5 Related Work
- Acknowlegements
- Appendix A Proof of Regressional Goodhart identity
- Lemma .
- Proof.
- Appendix B RL form details
- Appendix C Hyperparameters
- Instructions for reporting errors